Bank tiers33 banks
Top Investment Banks by Tier
33 investment banks grouped the way recruiting actually treats them, from the bulge brackets and elite boutiques down to the middle market and industry specialists. For 23 of them we also counted how many analysts each one employs and which schools they come from.
- Banks in the tier list
- 335 tiers
- Banks measured
- 23each with a feeder-school page
- Analysts counted
- 72,015classes of ~2015+
- Largest program
- J.P. Morgan9,048 analysts
- Its top feeder
- Columbia Universitylargest single school
The tiers at a glance
5 tiers · 33 banksWhat sets each tier apart, with the names you will hear most. Each tier opens its full list below.
| Tier | What sets it apart | Best-known banks |
|---|---|---|
| Bulge Bracket8 banks | Global full-service banks with the largest analyst classes | Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Bank of America |
| Elite Boutiques8 banks | Advisory-only firms winning bulge-bracket-sized mandates | Centerview, Evercore, Lazard, Moelis |
| In-Between-a-Banks6 banks | Balance-sheet banks whose best groups compete with the bulge brackets | Jefferies, Wells Fargo, RBC, HSBC |
| Middle Market8 banks | Smaller deals and leaner teams, so responsibility comes early | Houlihan Lokey, William Blair, Baird, Piper Sandler |
| Industry & Regional Boutiques3 banks | Specialists that lead a single sector or region | Rothschild & Co, LionTree, Leerink Partners |
Banks by analyst headcount
23 banks · classes of ~2015+The 23 banks we measure, largest program first, with the single school each one hires from most. Every row opens that bank’s full feeder-school ranking.
- 1J.P. MorganTop feeder school: Columbia University9,048
- 2Goldman SachsTop feeder school: Harvard University8,114
- 3Bank of AmericaTop feeder school: Columbia University6,590
- 4Morgan StanleyTop feeder school: Columbia University5,987
- 5CitiTop feeder school: Columbia University5,804
- 6UBSTop feeder school: Cornell University4,098
- 7BarclaysTop feeder school: Cornell University3,567
- 8Deutsche BankTop feeder school: Duke University3,541
- 9Wells FargoTop feeder school: UNC Chapel Hill2,919
- 10HSBCTop feeder school: Columbia University2,790
- 11JefferiesTop feeder school: University of Virginia2,758
- 12RBC Capital MarketsTop feeder school: Cornell University2,484
- 13LazardTop feeder school: University of Pennsylvania2,238
- 14Houlihan LokeyTop feeder school: University of Virginia1,980
- 15EvercoreTop feeder school: University of Pennsylvania1,883
- 16Piper SandlerTop feeder school: University of Virginia1,444
- 17MoelisTop feeder school: University of Pennsylvania1,369
- 18StifelTop feeder school: University of Virginia1,297
- 19Raymond JamesTop feeder school: University of Virginia1,286
- 20GuggenheimTop feeder school: Cornell University1,045
- 21Perella WeinbergTop feeder school: UC Berkeley717
- 22PJT PartnersTop feeder school: University of Pennsylvania598
- 23CenterviewTop feeder school: Harvard University458
Bulge Bracket
8 banksThe global full-service franchises. They have the largest analyst classes and the most structured recruiting — on-cycle timelines, school teams, and formal diversity programs — so staying on top of the process matters most.
- Goldman SachsThe name brand. TMT and FIG are among the most-competed seats on the street.New York8,114 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Goldman Sachs recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Morgan StanleyStrong in M&A — the M&A and Menlo Park tech teams place well.New York5,987 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Morgan Stanley recruit from? →Official site ↗
- J.P. MorganThe biggest balance sheet in the group and strength across every product.New York9,048 analysts, ~2015+What schools does J.P. Morgan recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Bank of AmericaStrong in leveraged finance; analyst seats in New York and Charlotte.Charlotte6,590 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Bank of America recruit from? →Official site ↗
- CitiThe most global network — strong in debt capital markets and cross-border deals.New York5,804 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Citi recruit from? →Official site ↗
- BarclaysInherited Lehman’s US franchise; strong industrials, power, and levfin.London3,567 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Barclays recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Deutsche BankUS franchise rebuilt around fewer, deeper groups — levfin-led.Frankfurt3,541 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Deutsche Bank recruit from? →Official site ↗
- UBSAbsorbed Credit Suisse in 2023; US IB footprint still resettling.Zurich4,098 analysts, ~2015+What schools does UBS recruit from? →Official site ↗
Elite Boutiques
8 banksAdvisory-only firms competing with the bulge brackets on M&A and restructuring, usually at higher analyst pay. Tiny classes mean every seat is networked for — expect deeper technicals and less structured processes.
- CenterviewFrequently the highest analyst comp on the street.New York458 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Centerview recruit from? →Official site ↗
- EvercoreThe largest elite boutique — M&A volume that rivals the bulge brackets.New York1,883 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Evercore recruit from? →Official site ↗
- LazardThe oldest advisory franchise; global M&A plus a top-tier restructuring practice.New York2,238 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Lazard recruit from? →Official site ↗
- MoelisGeneralist staffing model — broad deal reps unusually early.New York1,369 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Moelis recruit from? →Official site ↗
- PJT PartnersRSSG is a top destination for restructuring.New York598 analysts, ~2015+What schools does PJT Partners recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Perella WeinbergSenior-heavy deal teams; analysts sit close to the principals.New York717 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Perella Weinberg recruit from? →Official site ↗
- QatalystTech M&A only; known for intense hours and high pay.San Francisco
- GuggenheimEB comp and mandates; placement consensus still catching up.New York1,045 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Guggenheim recruit from? →Official site ↗
In-Between-a-Banks
6 banksBalance-sheet banks whose top groups compete at the bulge-bracket level while the broader platform recruits like middle market. Group selection matters more here than anywhere else — target the flagship teams.
- JefferiesDeal flow and comp now rival the BBs; often argued to belong a tier up.New York2,758 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Jefferies recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Wells FargoHuge balance sheet; building out its M&A franchise.San Francisco2,919 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Wells Fargo recruit from? →Official site ↗
- RBCUS build-out has made its NY seats competitive.Toronto2,484 analysts, ~2015+What schools does RBC recruit from? →Official site ↗
- HSBCThe global trade bank — strongest for EMEA and Asia coverage.London2,790 analysts, ~2015+What schools does HSBC recruit from? →Official site ↗
- BNP ParibasEurope’s balance-sheet leader, expanding its US investment bank.Paris
- MizuhoBought Greenhill in 2023.Tokyo
Middle Market
8 banksDeals are smaller and teams are leaner, so analysts get responsibility earlier. Exits to megafund PE are rarer, but reps-per-analyst are often better — and for lateral or off-cycle recruiting these firms are the most accessible on this page.
- Houlihan Lokey#1 in restructuring league tables — its RX group is elite-tier.Los Angeles1,980 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Houlihan Lokey recruit from? →Official site ↗
- William BlairLeading sell-side M&A firm for growth companies.Chicago
- BairdConsistent middle-market M&A franchise; strong industrials bench.Milwaukee
- Piper SandlerHealthcare- and financials-led, with deep sector benches.Minneapolis1,444 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Piper Sandler recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Raymond JamesFull-service platform with a steadily growing M&A practice.St. Petersburg1,286 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Raymond James recruit from? →Official site ↗
- Lincoln InternationalPrivate-markets specialist with heavy PE sell-side flow.Chicago
- Harris WilliamsPE sell-side specialist — arguably the best pure M&A reps in the MM.Richmond
- StifelAcquisitive platform (KBW, Miller Buckfire) with broad MM coverage.St. Louis1,297 analysts, ~2015+What schools does Stifel recruit from? →Official site ↗
Industry & Regional Boutiques
3 banksFirms built around one sector or one region. Outside finance the names mean less, but inside their industries they are often the first call, and Allen & Co. plays the same role in media as LionTree. If you already know the sector you want, one of these can be worth more than a bigger logo.
How the tiers compare
There is no perfect type of bank. The bulge brackets give you structured training and a name every recruiter recognizes. The cost is size: teams are big and the hierarchy runs deep.
Elite boutiques are close to the opposite. Teams are small enough that analysts work directly with senior bankers, and several pay above the bulge brackets. The tradeoff is a narrower platform with no balance sheet, so financing work happens elsewhere.
In-between-a-banks and middle-market firms sit between the two. They lack the scale of J.P. Morgan or Goldman Sachs, but many have a group that leads its industry, and a great healthcare team at a smaller bank can be a far better start than a weak group at a bigger name. Industry boutiques make that trade more sharply: if you already know the sector you want, the firm that dominates it may be the best seat available.
So pick the group before the logo. Look at the deals it works on and where its analysts go next, and ask current analysts what the culture is actually like. Ben goes deeper on that choice in Top Investment Banks: Groups, Rankings and Career Insights.
Top investment banks FAQ
6 questionsWhat are tier 1 investment banks?
“Tier 1” is not an official label, but most recruiters use it for Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and J.P. Morgan, and many extend it to the top elite boutiques such as Centerview and Evercore. “Tier 2” usually means the rest of the bulge bracket: Bank of America, Citi, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and UBS. Group strength matters more than either label, since a top group at a Tier 2 bank often places analysts better than a weak group at a Tier 1.
What are the bulge bracket investment banks?
The bulge brackets are the global full-service franchises: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Citi, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, UBS. They run the largest analyst classes — J.P. Morgan alone shows 9,048 people holding investment banking analyst titles from the classes of roughly 2015 onward — and the most structured on-cycle recruiting.
What is the difference between a bulge bracket and an elite boutique?
Bulge brackets are full-service: they lend, underwrite, trade, and advise, across every product and region. Elite boutiques advise only, so they take no balance-sheet risk and run far smaller analyst classes. The practical difference for recruiting is scale and odds: a bulge bracket may hire ten times as many analysts, while a boutique gives each analyst more deal exposure and typically pays at or above the bulge bracket.
Is Jefferies a bulge bracket bank?
Not by the usual definition, since it lacks the balance sheet and global product range of the bulge brackets. We list it as an in-between-a-bank, though its deal flow and analyst pay now rival the bulge brackets and many people argue it belongs a tier up.
Which investment bank hires the most analysts?
Of the 23 banks we measure, J.P. Morgan has the largest analyst population at 9,048 from the classes of roughly 2015 onward, and its largest single feeder school is Columbia University. Across all 23 banks we count 72,015 analysts.
Do I need to go to a target school to get into these banks?
It helps, but no school has a monopoly: no single school supplies more than about 7% of any one bank’s analysts. Each bank page here ranks the schools it actually hires from, so you can see how concentrated a given bank’s pipeline really is before deciding how hard to network into it.
Where these numbers come from
Analyst counts are people whose public professional profile lists that bank, an investment banking analyst title, and a graduation year of 2013 or later — the analyst classes of roughly 2015 onward — via People Data Labs, deduplicated per bank. Those conditions apply to the profile, not to a single job: the source flattens employment history, so we cannot confirm the analyst title was held at that bank rather than elsewhere in the same career. Counts are also floors, since the source covers a subset of LinkedIn and bankers who list themselves as just “Analyst” never enter them. The effect is largest for banks with big non-advisory workforces — Wells Fargo above all. Tiers reflect common US recruiting consensus as of mid-2026; group-level strength varies more than any list can capture, so when in doubt pick the stronger group over the shinier logo.



